What IREAD looks like from the inside
Indiana made a test it cannot defend powerful enough to hold children back. We rebuilt IREAD-3 from the inside to expose the machinery behind one of the darkest failures of judgment, evidence and responsibility in state history.
The Luminary Network
What IREAD is
A 38-question multiple-choice reading test, taken on a computer. There is one line on it: 446. Above the line a child goes to fourth grade. Below it, they do third grade again.
Below the score line does not mean a child cannot read. You can know how to read and fail this test. The questions are strange — not always straightforward — and it was never crafted to find out why a child struggles.
What a child is given
- No chance to read aloud to anyone — no adult ever hears them read
- No measure of fluency — 0% of the questions
- No measure of phonemic awareness — 0% of the questions
- Barely a phonics test — four questions
- If the child has dyslexia: the computer reads the directions, not the passage
- If the child is still learning English: no glossary, in any language
The questions themselves
These are real IREAD questions, published by the Indiana Department of Education in its own item sampler and item specifications. Read them the way an eight-year-old meets them — alone, on a screen, with a year of school resting on the answer.
Released item
“Find the word that has the suffix, and ONLY the suffix, underlined.”
- careless
- beautiful
- quicker
- suddenly
All four words have a suffix. The child is not being asked to read them — they are being asked to judge whether somebody else drew the underline in the right place. A child who reads all four words perfectly can get this wrong.
IREAD-3 Item Sampler, Indiana Department of EducationReleased item
“Find the word that has the same vowel sound as the underlined part of sad.”
- pain
- chart
- crash
- waste
Four different spellings of the letter a, four different sounds. This is a sorting exercise about English spelling. Nothing about it tells you whether a child can read a book.
IREAD-3 Item Sampler, Indiana Department of EducationReleased item
“Find the word that has the same beginning sounds as grass…grass.”
- gray
- guest
- glove
The word is spoken aloud, twice. The child has to hold two consonant sounds in their head and match them against three printed words that all start with g. Miss what was said and there is no way back to the answer.
IREAD-3 Item Sampler, Indiana Department of EducationReleased item
“At school Joe saw a bike, a swing, and a book. What did Joe see last?”
- a bike
- a book
- a swing
The answer is the last noun in the sentence. Indiana files this under text structure and rates it Depth of Knowledge 2 — the hardest level of thinking anything on this test is rated at.
IREAD-3 Item Specifications, standard 3.RN.3.2What Indiana's own specifications say
Indiana's own specifications list two item types, and only two: multiple choice, and multi-part multiple choice. A child is never once asked to read something out loud, or to write a sentence.
Depth of Knowledge runs 1 to 4. Across Indiana's published IREAD items, nothing is rated above 2. The test that decides whether a child repeats a year does not ask a single question above the second of four levels.
Some of what IREAD tests is not third grade work. The specifications assess first-grade and second-grade standards — 1.RF.3, 2.RF.2, 1.RC.4 — inside the test used to hold a third grader back.
This is what 446 is measuring. Below the line does not mean a child cannot read. It means they got fewer of these right.
This test was never built to do this
From the contract Indiana signed with Cambium Assessment, the test provider.
“…scale scores are mapped to two performance levels: Level 1: Did Not Pass · Level 2: Pass.”
Contract, p. 43
Can it tell you why a child failed? No. This is a very basic test — 38 multiple-choice questions, and one of two words back. It cannot say whether a child struggles with sounds, with vocabulary, with a computer, or was reading fine and met strange questions on a bad morning. Teachers were promised feedback. What they get is a verdict — and they are left to carry the retakes, the summer school and the retraining themselves. Indiana's own sample report home is a number and three percentages, and one instruction: contact your student's teacher or school principal.
Contract, pp. 42–43; IREAD-3 sample Individual Student Report, IDOE
“IREAD-3 applies principles of evidence-centered design.”
Contract, p. 42
Evidence of what? The science of reading has five parts: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension. Indiana paid for a study of its own test against them. The answer: phonemic awareness 0% of questions. Fluency 0%. Phonics four questions. The report states the test cannot measure fluency. The Department has had that finding since 2023.
EdMetric LLC, commissioned by IDOE, filed with the General Assembly, 2023
Whatever you believe this test measures, nobody improves a result they refuse to examine. Indiana has shown no interest in why these children did not clear the line — not to fix the teaching, not to fix the test. You cannot raise a number you have never tried to understand.
And the 9,100 who just failed?
Roughly 9,100 third graders did not pass this year. At the State Board meeting on 11 August 2026 — the meeting announcing the results — that number was never said aloud. Neither was the word retention. No board member asked what happens to those children. This system is Secretary Jenner's. The inattention starts at the top.
IDOE 2026 results; transcript, Indiana State Board of Education, 11 August 2026
Every figure Indiana celebrated this week travelled from Cambium Assessment to the Department and onto a podium. Nothing has been asked. Indiana's education press has failed us — not one reporter has asked for any understanding of the children who fail.
We are going to change that.
The Department files an eight-year-old's score under career and postsecondary readiness — on the dashboard that ends in median income five years after graduation — and publishes, with no source given anywhere, that passing makes a child “roughly 35% more likely to graduate high school.”
Indiana GPS indicators and methods of calculation, IDOE; in.gov/doe
Who in their right mind believes that?
Indiana's Department of Education is a marketing operation in control of our children's education.
If you want to see how ridiculous it is that this test carries so much weight in a child's life — how “proficient” you are at reading, as they would say — you can take it yourself. We built exact replicas of all of Indiana's learning assessments.
Take the IREAD yourself, and see how others have done →
A child's love of books belongs to that child. To the media: you have used that story over and over, in a way that hands the credit to this test and to Secretary Jenner. By doing so you hand them a stamp of approval — to carry on with Cambium Assessment, to keep pretending, and to keep hurting children in the name of reading, which is not what this test measures or represents.
The accounts
We have not found all the children who were held back, and Indiana has not said who they are. These are the experiences of the people who have to live in the strange, fake reading-test world Secretary Jenner is creating — parents, grandparents, teachers and school staff. Every line below was said publicly by the person named.
My son is being held back despite me nor his teachers not having any real concern about his third grade reading or comprehension skills.
I don't know how, for an 8 or 9-year-old, that you tell them they're not good at reading and then make them do the year all over when it's already been a struggle for them — and then what, just tell them to try harder at school?
It's just putting kids in a bad education situation for the rest of their lives.
My son's entire 3rd grade missed their 2nd recess for an entire semester for additional Iread practice, even though the majority had already passed it in 2nd grade.
My son told me this morning his son broke down in tears in the car as they pulled up and he couldn't figure out why. He did get him calmed down but I know he is worried about him. He wasn't like that on e-learning day at my house Tuesday. He was laughing and worked hard and fast to finish all his assignments so he could have free time to play.
He took the test three times, scoring about the same even after summer school and their literacy specialist.
My youngest son's newly assigned case manager, who got her masters in special education in the past 5 years, admitted to me that she has never heard of developmental language disorder before and does not know how to help my son. She also admitted she knows very little about dyslexia. My older son's case manager does not know what dysgraphia is.
My daughter was one of them that was going to be held back. They tried to hold her back in second grade to get ahead of it and I declined. As soon as this law took effect I fought for her. She already had an IEP for speech and I fought to get her additional testing for learning disability, which she did qualify for one. In the end she finally passed.
I know my grandson can read. I taught him. My son has listened to him read. He reads fourth grade level books easily. He's doing tutoring, but he tells us it's stuff like sounding out and spelling cat, which he was doing several years ago.
He told me he didn't have enough time to do the computerized test. He thought he could take his time.
My child has not taken these tests. My child has not taken these tests. My child has not taken these tests. There, I said it three times.
Our school spent weeks prepping, doing practice tests, etc. Put all spelling tests on hold for about a month, at least.
They made it seem like it was mandatory that they pass in the second grade, when really they're testing them on things that aren't even in his grade level yet. They made it seem so scary, and didn't explain it well enough that it would be OK if he didn't pass this year.
Not everyone is good at taking tests. Not every child gets enough sleep and a solid breakfast to be able to sustain through the test, and that is beyond the teacher's control. And then add the pressure that if they don't pass a test they can't move on.
I'm about to the point of withdrawing permission for my son to take standardized tests and the school can just get over it. He wouldn't be on the honor roll with all A's and B's if he wasn't learning what he needs to be learning.
My grandson was so anxious about taking it, and was relieved to pass it.
They also, at our school anyway, are forced to take summer school after 2nd grade if they don't pass the IREAD at the end of the year. If they pass at the end of 2nd grade they don't have to take it in third, but if they fail it in third they get held back.
If the retention part has always been there, we were never told that. So I highly doubted it was an automatic hold back. Now it seems to be enforced.
The number of 'diagnostics' and computer testings my children do each school year is mind blowing.
I went to the IDOE website. It just wasn't as extensive as I had hoped. I was looking for an actual practice test but couldn't get anything like it to print.
They can be held back for not passing a test, yet when a parent wants to hold them back in kindergarten or first grade they have to jump through hoops.
They allowed 2nd graders to take it last year as well as 3rd graders, to see if they could test out and not have to take it as a 3rd grader. My daughter passed it as a second grader, so she doesn't take it this year.
They are also testing them in second grade to see where each kid is, and if they pass in second they don't have to take the IREAD in third — just ILEARN.
The school I'm at, only 4 passed last year. We retested twice over the summer and got up to 10.
Even with a good cause exemption, kids still have to take and pass. The exemption just allows a student with an IEP to not be held back because of a failing score. Kids will have to continue to take this test until 7th grade until they pass.
We really only have three weeks to make a huge gain for some of our students, and a lot of that's not realistic. Some of them are pretty far off and don't have an exemption and will be retained.
We are forced to teach for the tests and it's sad.
I've seen it in every school I've worked in. It isn't even about learning to read. It's about passing a test.
Could it be because there were such high stakes — mandatory retention — that schools ONLY focused on IREAD and nothing else?
That is taking away time from science, social studies, and math, not to mention time to explore choice reading, and causing kids to hate school — which will be far more detrimental in the long run.
I believe the fear of retention and the implementation of the science of reading led to some of these gains.
When I was in MTSS meetings about 2 years back, in anticipation of this law going into effect, many students that may have once been thought to benefit from being held back were being pushed into the next grade. It was thought that if they held someone back, then that person still failed the test, they would still be required to hold them a 2nd year.
Two years ago when they touted the strong increase, they never shared that they removed the timing, which was a significant barrier for many kids. This year they added an additional testing opportunity, but are again not sharing that.
Why I refuse to go back to teaching. There is no teaching, it is all about passing tests. According to the leaders you are perfect if you can pass a test, and who cares if you are a bad test taker.
I swear some of the passages are the same as they were 10 years ago. The only difference is they had to add more, because they are now giving at least 2 more opportunities to test — 2nd grade, and you can retake it twice in the summer window.
We did after school tutoring for months, and summer school for our kids at risk of not passing. Lots of time and energy.
The child is bored. Don't accept the results for his placement. Demand a human assessment after a month of regular human tutoring.
No spelling tests. Kids moving onto 4th grade and cannot spell beginner words. Same with math — seeing kids in 3rd and 4th grade that can't subtract multiple-digit numbers.
Not all kids get to the same level of reading. Our concern is the lack of prevention.
For us, we have a large English language learning population. This is also difficult for our special education students — many of them, especially depending on what kind of early learning experience they had.
There are schools out there who previously had extremely low pass rates who did whatever they could to focus on making kids pass.
Students with IEPs still have to take these tests, as well as English Language Learners that have been in country for a short amount of time. They can apply for a good cause exemption for those students, but they have DRASTICALLY reduced the number of those that are allowed.
I hated it for the kids when testing became the norm. I tried to make it as fun as I could. I wasn't a good test taker before I was a teacher, so I knew how it felt.
The law changed and good cause exemptions weren't allowed anymore. Before we could give a GCE to students with IEPs or students who are learning English.
If your kids use these programs and are moved to a lower tier, you must demand a human assessment as well.
IREAD 3 is an untimed assessment. Focus on reading passages and comprehension questions. There is a phonics section but comprehension is the bulk. You can find released items on the IDOE website.
They did change it a little — it's no longer timed. For some, the time constraint would cause them not to pass.
It's like they just paused at kindergarten or first grade, and now they're in third grade. I'm helping them pick up on basically two years of learning.
We celebrate the schools that have 90% or above. That's still — at Concord, there are about 400 students in a grade — that's still 40 students.
The new law says that students should pass within two years of arriving in Indiana. So if students are in another state or another country where they speak another language, they have two years or less to obtain enough proficiency in English to pass a reading test that is at the same grade level as their peers.
What about our multilingual learners? It takes 6-7 years to become fluent in a language. Are they going to retain students whose native language isn't English in 3rd grade?
Nope, they just pass them. Just like they did me.
She's not unique. There are kids whose parents die who take the test the next day. Kids are people. They're not statistics. There has to be some room.
They passed a law that said kids who don't pass have to be retained, so they taught the kids how to pass the test — that's confusing on purpose — instead of actual learning.
This mandate for retention is life-changing for every one of those kids. And so we are taking it with that level of seriousness.
Indiana is setting itself up for an enormous class action lawsuit.
We've known for a long time that retention is not a research-based strategy.
This is an unfunded mandate, so no additional money came from the state to help these kids. And now we will need to spend money on an extra year of education costs before they graduate high school.
Literally, if they didn't pass they would have to take third grade over again. Teachers only focused on the IREAD.
It's very stressful for these 8 and 9 year olds.
They were told if they fail they'll stay in 3rd grade, so they had a little extra weight on their shoulders.
They had more chances to fail, but that doesn't fit the district narratives.
Standardized tests have their use, but they need to be their own lane, and a small one. Teaching to the test is garbage.
How 412 kids last couple years and 3,000 kids — it's just ridiculous. Boggles the mind.
They haven't come up with a remediation program to get to kids before they take the test in third grade. We don't know how to connect the dots. We're stuck on stupid.
Scare the poop out of parents, teachers and kids by retaining kids who are struggling, and then pretend this plan is a success.
And they get to take it twice in second grade and three times in third grade. That helps the average.
It's not that they weren't taught to read — they're learning two languages. It takes more time. By the time they reach fourth and fifth grade, they're surpassing their monolingual peers.
Kids are people. They're not statistics.
A note on sources
Every line above was said publicly by the person named — posted to Facebook, or given to an Indiana news outlet, which is marked on the card. Quotes are verbatim apart from light trimming and the correction of obvious typing errors. Nothing has been added, and no account has been paraphrased. Contract quotations are from the 2025 Indiana–Cambium Assessment agreement, 213 pp., with page numbers as given. The alignment study was commissioned by the Indiana Department of Education and filed with the General Assembly.